06:42 *gavel* 06:47 David Graham 06:49 CR: Mako and Jimmy both have committments soon. 06:52 Branden Robinson. 06:58 John Goerzen 06:59 guests, please /msg me your name for the minutes 07:02 Jimmy Kaplowitz 07:13 [item 1, opening] This meeting of the Board of Software in the Public Interest, Inc., is called to order. 07:13 PLEASE NOTE: Our agenda for today, AND all the resolutions and minutes we will be voting on, are online at: 07:13 http://www.spi-inc.org/secretary/agenda/ 07:13 [item 2, roll call] Board members, please state your name for the record. Others present may /msg cdlu with your full name if you wish to be listed in the records. 07:13 We have 9 board members, so quorum for today is 6. 07:14 guests = all non board members. A lot of minutes have people talking who didn't register... 07:19 Joey 07:27 how quorate are we? 07:33 CR: exactly 07:42 CosmicRay, we had 6 out of 6 required by you walking in 07:43 No Bruce, Diziet, Bdale 07:50 mako was just here, joey joined shortly before the meeting 08:06 joey, mako, ping! 08:14 sorry 08:15 cdlu: joey never does the name thing anyway 08:21 i'm Benjamin Mako Hill and i'm here 08:22 Hydroxide, he's too good for that. ;) 08:22 That's why I did it for him. 08:26 cdlu: is that everyone? 08:33 CR, all present and accounted for. 08:38 anything urgent that we need to cover right now? 08:47 4 treasurer's reports to approve 08:50 Yes, anything to vote on, and Jimmy's report and Treas issues. 08:51 and 1 minutes 08:54 4 sets of treasurer's reports, a set of minutes, and the Nessus fork are the new things to work on today 09:09 ok, let's do the nessus fork first 09:11 I have already reviewed Jimmy's 4 new reports, and they look fine to me. 09:12 Oh. 09:13 whose item is this? 09:21 Nessus fork project membership: OpenVAS (see also openvas.org(Tim Brown ([machine])) 09:38 [machine], are you here? 09:41 he's 4.5 hours idle 09:44 We'll need to shelve this if the advocate is not here to speak for it. 09:46 and also /away 09:58 ok, then let's look at treasurer business I guess. 10:00 * Overfiend moves to shelve it. 10:06 * CosmicRay tries to be fast 10:15 overfiend, careful, someone might second... ;) 10:29 we have some reports to approve. I haven't had a chance to look at them yet but we could vote anyway if others are ready. 10:31 CosmicRay, ask for discussion/vote on 4 reports as a group? 10:38 yes 10:43 cdlu: I forget, can the president unilaterally change the agenda, barring explicit objection? 10:43 is there a motion to approve all 4 reports? 10:51 * Overfiend moves to approve all 4 Treasurer reports 10:54 * mako seconds 10:54 * Hydroxide seconds 10:57 Overfiend, noone's ever stopped him before... 10:58 as they appear at http://www.spi-inc.org/secretary/agenda/2005-11-15.html 11:06 cdlu: :) 11:06 ok, then let's vote on approving the 4 reports. 11:06 !vote start 11:06 Starting a new vote 11:08 !vote yes 11:08 Noted yes vote from Hydroxide 11:10 !vote abstain 11:10 Noted abstain vote from CosmicRay 11:10 whoa, the bot works 11:11 !vote yes 11:11 Noted yes vote from Joey 11:13 !vote yes 11:13 Noted yes vote from Overfiend 11:15 Overfiend: shocking 11:22 !vote yes 11:22 Noted yes vote from mako 11:26 !vote yes 11:26 Noted yes vote from cdlu 11:40 !vote stop 11:40 vote result: yes. 5 yes votes, 0 no votes and 1 abstentions 11:46 The 4 reports are approved. 11:47 good good 11:51 motion 2005-11-15.br.1: Approve 4 motions approved. 11:58 SPI's website isn't working for me so can someone tell me what's next on the agenda 12:07 CR: we should probably handle 6.1 next 12:07 (I think its ipv6 is hosed again) 12:10 1. Opening 12:10 2. Roll call 12:10 + David Graham may not be able to make it 12:10 3. President's report (John Goerzen) 12:10 4. Treasurer's report (Jimmy Kaplowitz) 12:10 5. Outstanding minutes 12:10 Tax filing and bookkeeping status 12:16 Overfiend has the update on that 12:18 1. June 21st, 2005 12:20 oh yeah, minutes 12:26 hydroxide, try reading it from the agenda :) 12:26 that should be approved first 12:29 yeah, voting on those should come first 12:34 sorry 12:42 ok. minutes. 12:43 I read the June 21st minutes before the meeting and they seem fine 13:04 I hope you like these minutes. The tax filing discussion gave me an ulcer. 13:15 * Overfiend moves to accept the 21 June minutes as posted at http://www.spi-inc.org/secretary/minutes/20050621.txt 13:25 * cdlu seconds 13:35 ok, we have a motion and a second to approve the june 21 minutes. 13:36 !vote start 13:36 Starting a new vote 13:39 !vote yes 13:40 Noted yes vote from cdlu 13:42 !vote yes 13:42 Noted yes vote from Hydroxide 13:42 !vote abstain 13:42 Noted abstain vote from CosmicRay 13:44 !vote yes 13:44 Noted yes vote from mako 14:02 overfiend, joey... 14:04 !vote yes 14:04 Noted yes vote from Overfiend 14:13 sorry, I was reading what I moved to approve 14:14 :) 14:16 3 yes, 1 abstain.. outcome no longer a question 14:18 well the outcome is no longer in doubt 14:19 !vote stop 14:19 vote result: yes. 4 yes votes, 0 no votes and 1 abstentions 14:24 !vote abstain 14:24 Noted abstain vote from Joey 14:25 are there more minutes to approve? 14:29 not yet 14:30 sorry 14:30 Only logs. 14:33 ooo, the agenda finally loaded ;-) 14:37 logs don't need approving :) 14:37 !vote stop 14:37 vote result: yes. 4 yes votes, 0 no votes and 2 abstentions 14:45 ok, then let's move to tax filing and bookkeeping status 14:46 (2 abstentions, just updating that) 14:55 oh damn 14:56 CR, the rest of the agenda, for the record: 14:56 1. Tax filing and book keeping status (Jimmy) 14:56 2. Debian Core Consortium related issues (Mako) 14:56 3. OFTC election results (cdlu) 14:56 4. Debian website copyright issues (Tommi Vainikainen) [see appendix] 14:56 5. Nessus fork project membership: OpenVAS (see also openvas.org(Tim Brown ([machine])) 15:07 Hydroxide/Overfiend: did you guys see the inquiry about a receipt that I sent? 15:07 oh, I forgot to take OFTC election results off there 15:08 nevermind 15:15 I seem to have sent it to board twice but I can't recall seeing it at all 15:18 i am here to represent OpenVAS, missed the role call for [machine] 15:23 CosmicRay: when? there is SPI mail blockage 15:28 CosmicRay: I did, and I believe I have it in the batch of September donations 15:36 tupawk: we'll get back to you in a sec, thanks 15:43 ah, ok. see Overfiend then :) 15:47 Overfiend: will you reply to her or should I tell her something? 16:06 CosmicRay: I will reply. Nagging encouraged until you see a CC 16:10 But I plan to do it today. 16:18 Overfiend: excellent 16:21 thanks 16:23 That plan often fails for me, but it *is* the plan. 16:26 heh 16:39 anything else on the bookkeeping stuff? I saw a mail snafu got sorted out... 16:39 Also, everyone should know 16:50 Yes, there was a SNAFU with the documents mailed to MBS 16:53 that for once was not my fault 17:06 MBS claimed not to get the notice of certified mail delivery 17:12 it was delivered on 22 Oct but they didn't pick it up until yesterday 17:16 Frank said they'd work on it immediately 17:17 heh 17:22 Overfiend: we should ask him to clarify what address we should use, which might or might not be correct 17:22 so I will pass along an update as soon as I have one 17:26 Hydroxide: I did. 17:29 I used the right one. 17:30 Overfiend: okay 17:34 Someone in NY just dropped the ball. 17:44 not a good sign for a bookkeeping service, but hopefully it won't keep happening 17:48 it could have been the USPS screwup, too 17:53 so it might not be MBS's fault either 17:56 Frank was *very* fast to respond, and to pick it up 18:08 I mailed him at, like 1530 EST and they had gone to get it by the end of the day 18:11 yeah. we can blame USPS and not worry too much :) 18:23 if it was their fuck up, they clean up really nice. 18:46 anyway, that's it on that front AFAIK 18:57 I am pokey to make deposits and am eager for MBS to take this over. 19:18 it makes our income look way more erratic on the Treas reports than it really is. 19:34 ok, thanks for the update. anything else on that? 19:37 No. 19:46 i'm about to turn into a pumpkin 19:51 Jimmy too. 19:53 OK. Let's skip to 6.5 really fast 19:53 as is jimmy 20:06 tupawk: this is you 20:06 Nessus fork project membership: OpenVAS (see also openvas.org(Tim Brown ([machine])) 20:17 I think we have talked to you a bit about this already, right? 20:21 correct 20:32 If we lose voting ability b/c we become inquorate, we can vote via email, or shelve until the Dec meeting if OpenVAS is not time-critical. 20:33 does anyone on the board have additional questions? 20:47 or are we ready to approve the request? 20:48 * Overfiend surfs to openvas.org 20:56 noone's written a resolution for it yet afaik, but I have no objections or further questions 21:06 Overfiend: if you follow the link from the agenda, he covers the basics that we've talked about already 21:18 right 21:31 cdlu: We could always just move to accept them as a member project and pass a more formal resolution next month. 21:41 CR, so moved. 21:46 * Overfiend seconds 21:56 this vote is to accept openvas as a SPI member project. 21:57 !vote start 21:57 Starting a new vote 21:59 !vote yes 21:59 Noted yes vote from cdlu 22:04 !vote yes 22:04 Noted yes vote from CosmicRay 22:06 !vote yes 22:06 Noted yes vote from Hydroxide 22:07 tupawk: Looks like a good idea, given that I endorsed it in an interview with the press. :) 22:10 !vote yes 22:10 Noted yes vote from Overfiend 22:12 :) 22:18 mako the pumpkin, still here? :) 22:23 !vote yes 22:24 Noted yes vote from mako 22:25 joey... 22:37 CR, unanimous so far :) 22:37 !vote stop 22:37 vote result: yes. 5 yes votes, 0 no votes and 0 abstentions 22:42 !vote yes 22:42 Noted yes vote from Joey 22:45 !vote stop 22:45 vote result: yes. 6 yes votes, 0 no votes and 0 abstentions 22:46 !vote stop 22:46 vote result: yes. 6 yes votes, 0 no votes and 0 abstentions 22:46 yay 22:47 thanks tupawk, and sorry for being so hurried today 22:52 mako: any DCC comments? 22:53 np, thank all of you 22:57 (moving back to 6.2) 23:01 CosmicRay: nothing from me no 23:17 ok, if there's nothing to discuss on the DCC side, then on to 6.3 and cdlu 23:18 mako: should it be dropped from the agenda until further notice? 23:52 CR, 6.3 is left over from last month's agenda, I don't think there's anything new to say there yet. 23:57 ok. 23:57 * cdlu forgot to remove it 23:58 * Overfiend has not heard any further complains about DCC in a while, and has not heard of any from dondelelcaro 24:07 ah, good. 24:13 then we have the debian website copyright iddue, 6.4 24:14 oh, on the DCC front, I posted an article about it to NewsForge 24:18 after bugging everyone I could think of about it 24:22 heh 24:30 afk now ... bye all 24:32 This issue has been reported as a bug, please see: 24:35 Congrats tupawk 24:36 the mail appears to be truncated there 24:45 right, where are my manners? 24:46 24:49 tupawk: welcome aboard! 24:53 tupawk: thank you for showing up today, again my apologies for trying to squeeze 60 minutes o fmeeting into 15 ;-) 25:01 hehe 25:09 Let us please draft a proper resolution welcoming OpenVAS to the SPI family for the next meeting. 25:12 ... and for being late myself. 25:14 yes. 25:23 who makes sure that the Projects page on the website is updated? 25:28 We can use the TeXmacs one as a boilerplate. 25:32 Overfiend: do you know, is there consensus within debian to adjust the copyright to a different license? 25:39 luk, not sure, actually. 25:43 alright, i need to run 25:45 CosmicRay: Not AFAIK. 25:46 apologies everyone 25:46 luk: nobody, unfortunately, would you like to? 25:51 Overfiend: yeah, lets drop it until further knowledge 25:54 thanks mako 25:54 CosmicRay: er, well. I think there is consensus to change it. 25:55 mako, thanks for coming. have fun.. wherever it is you're going. :) 26:07 sorry to run 26:07 CosmicRay: But not on what to change it to. 26:09 CosmicRay: ok, I can do that 26:11 Overfiend: I'd be in favor of following the Debian consensus, and not touching it until then 26:14 CosmicRay: Some people I've spoken to were hoping the revised GNU FDL would be ready by now. 26:15 luk: great, thanks much 26:29 is the Projects page actually up to date now (except for openvas)? 26:32 CosmicRay: sounds reasonable. 26:36 luk: I believe so. 26:40 CR, want to adjourn until December 20th, or do we have more business? 26:57 cdlu: well, let's talk about that date. a lot of people are on vacation already that time 27:06 including myself 27:07 should we move it back 1 week? 27:08 want to go earlier? 27:10 shall we try to have a meeting anyway, or just give up now and go for january 27:15 December 2005 27:15 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 27:15 1 2 3 27:15 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 27:15 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 27:17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 27:19 overfiend, to the 27th? 27:20 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 27:25 one week earlier would probably be better than one week later 27:26 or forwrad to the 13th? 27:28 the 27th is not earlier than the 20th :) 27:31 shoot for the 13th then? 27:43 * Overfiend likes the 13th. 27:47 well, I'm all for the 13th. 27:49 me too. 27:53 ok 27:57 13th fine atm 28:06 ok, is seems that we have unanimous consent for the next meeting to be Dec. 13 at 19:00 UTC 28:06 ok 28:09 is there any other business? 28:13 nothing here 28:15 * Overfiend has none. 28:18 * cdlu is almost CF-DLU 28:19 we are adjourned until Dec. 13. 28:21 *gavel*