20:02 #spi: < Ganneff> *BANG*
20:02 #spi: < Ganneff> [item 1, Opening] Welcome to today's Software in the Public Interest board of directors meeting, which is now called to order.
20:02 #spi: < Ganneff> The agenda can be found on the web at:  http://www.spi-inc.org/meetings/agendas/2014/2014-02-13/
20:02 #spi: < Ganneff> [item 2, Roll Call]
20:02 #spi: < Ganneff> Board members, please state your name for the record.  As we have nine board members, quorum for today's meeting is six. Guests (including board advisors), please /msg your names to Noodles if you wish your attendance to be recorded in the minutes of this meeting.
20:02 #spi: < Ganneff> Noodles: any regrets?
20:02 #spi: < Clint> Clint Adams
20:02 #spi: < Ganneff> Joerg Jaspert
20:02 #spi: < schultmc> Michael Schultheiss
20:02 #spi: < Noodles> Jonathan McDowell
20:02 #spi: < Solver> Robert Brockway
20:02 #spi: < Noodles> Regrets received from Hydroxide.
20:02 #spi: < Ganneff> i count 5, so one more and we can go on
20:03 #spi: < Noodles> linuxhiker,bdale,zobel?
20:04 #spi: < Ganneff> hrm. lets give it til :07 and then... next month. or want more wait?
20:05 #spi: < Noodles> I've texted bdale.
20:05 #spi: < Noodles> I don't think I have either other number convenient.
20:06 #spi: < schultmc> zobel's mobile is in board-private
20:06 #spi: < Solver> great. I was just checking
20:06 #spi: < Noodles> I can text him if someone /msgs me it.
20:07 #spi: < Solver> sent
20:07 #spi: < Ganneff> ook, so not :7, lets wait a little more.
20:07 #spi: < Ganneff> bad you all :)
20:08 #spi: < Noodles> Sent.
20:10 #spi:  * Noodles updates his contact details to reflect the change of continent.
20:10 #spi: < Ganneff> minor details
20:10 #spi: < Solver> :)
20:10 #spi: < Noodles> Well, also I checked the tree out for future reference.
20:11 #spi: < bkuhn> While you all wait for your quorum could I raise an inquiry that probably doesn't require quorum to give me some more info on? 
20:12 #spi: < Solver> Sure...
20:12 #spi: < Ganneff> sure, but i think wait is over soon.
20:12 #spi: < bkuhn> So, Conservancy has been wondering if SPI will present us with a new proposed grant agreement.
20:12 #spi: < bkuhn> but, if you get your quorum, this surely goes under new business for you. :)
20:13 #spi: < Ganneff> yeah, otherwise i stop this at :15.
20:13 #spi: < Ganneff> and, err, i have no idea about your question
20:13 #spi: < Noodles> I'm not sure what the hold up was on the agreement.
20:14 #spi: < Solver> SFC sent an email
20:14 #spi: < bkuhn> Noodles: from our perspective: Bdale and Jimmy had approved some wording on May 11, 2013.  SPI tossed it to its legal counsel, your legal counsel talked to your legal counsel.  Your legal counsel said it was "back in the hands of [her] client"
20:14 #spi: < bkuhn> Anyway, as Solver mentions, details of status was in an email dated Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:26:22 -0500 from Conservancy's Tony Sebro, message-id:  <52F5173E.8030106@sfconservancy.org>
20:15 #spi: < Ganneff> and as it doesnt look like we get more people...
20:15 #spi: < Ganneff> *GAVEL*