2026-05-11 20:08:03	schultmc	[item 1, Opening]
2026-05-11 20:08:03	schultmc	Welcome to today's Software in the Public Interest Board Meeting, which
2026-05-11 20:08:03	schultmc	is now called to order. Today's agenda can be found on the web at:
2026-05-11 20:08:03	schultmc	https://www.spi-inc.org/meetings/agendas/2026/2026-05-11/
2026-05-11 20:08:05	schultmc	[item 2, Roll Call]
2026-05-11 20:08:08	schultmc	Directors, please state your name
2026-05-11 20:08:09	fsf	Forrest Fleming
2026-05-11 20:08:10	schultmc	Guests, please /msg your names to fungi if you wish your attendance to be
2026-05-11 20:08:10	milan	Milan Kupcevic
2026-05-11 20:08:11	jconway	Joe Conway
2026-05-11 20:08:13	schultmc	recorded in the minutes of this meeting.
2026-05-11 20:08:15	schultmc	.
2026-05-11 20:08:16	borden	Borden Rhodes
2026-05-11 20:08:16	fungi	Jeremy Stanley
2026-05-11 20:08:17	mappx	Katie McMillan
2026-05-11 20:08:18	zumbi	Héctor Orón Martínez
2026-05-11 20:08:18	schultmc	fungi, do we have any regrets?
2026-05-11 20:08:20	schultmc	Michael Schultheiss
2026-05-11 20:08:20	Jesusalva[m]	Jonatas L Nogueira
2026-05-11 20:08:23	fungi	no regrets!
2026-05-11 20:08:36	schultmc	[item 3, President's Report]
2026-05-11 20:08:36	schultmc	I am continuing to assist with the treasury team to ensure timely processing
2026-05-11 20:08:36	schultmc	of payments and reimbursements. We are also working with to prepare for
2026-05-11 20:08:36	schultmc	the auditing of our 2025 financial documents and federal and New York State
2026-05-11 20:08:36	schultmc	filings.
2026-05-11 20:08:39	schultmc	</done>
2026-05-11 20:08:41	schultmc	[item 4, Vice President's Report]
2026-05-11 20:08:44	schultmc	Jesusalva[m]: Anything to add?
2026-05-11 20:09:29	Jesusalva[m]	VP report: I'll be leaving on vacations starting May 21st and ending June 8th. I will have limited availability during this time. Please plan accordingly if you require me during this period.
2026-05-11 20:09:43	Jesusalva[m]	Our other officers are expected to remain available as usual.
2026-05-11 20:09:47	Jesusalva[m]	</done>
2026-05-11 20:10:05	schultmc	[item 5, Treasurer's Report]
2026-05-11 20:10:07	schultmc	zumbi?
2026-05-11 20:10:33	zumbi	- Payment queue is now processed up to the end of April.
2026-05-11 20:10:33	zumbi	- Put contingency plans in place to cover for a contractor’s absence so payments keep flowing smoothly.
2026-05-11 20:10:36	zumbi	- Spoke with projects depending on STF funds to align expectations and improve payment timelines.
2026-05-11 20:10:39	zumbi	- Completed registration in Microsoft Partner Center to support the hardware certifications needed by some projects.
2026-05-11 20:10:57	zumbi	I'll be away next week May 18th to May 22nd.
2026-05-11 20:10:57	zumbi	If you have any urgency, please reach out.
2026-05-11 20:10:57	zumbi	Thanks very much for the continuous work of the treasurer team, including president, vice-president and contractors.
2026-05-11 20:11:07	zumbi	</done>
2026-05-11 20:11:40	schultmc	[item 6, Secretary's report]
2026-05-11 20:11:41	schultmc	fungi?
2026-05-11 20:11:44	fungi	As my Secretary term comes to a close next month, I want to encourage other directors to stand for this office. While taking care of meeting agendas/minutes and conflict of interest declarations has been manageable, I lack both proficiency and bandwidth for tasks like event coordination, managing our social media presence, or getting the nascent Communications Committee off the ground.
2026-05-11 20:11:44	fungi	I'll be happy to assist any incoming Secretary with the duties I've been performing so far, if that's desired.
2026-05-11 20:11:47	fungi	EOF
2026-05-11 20:12:12	schultmc	[item 7, Outstanding minutes]
2026-05-11 20:12:12	schultmc	The minutes for 2026-04-13 are outstanding. They may be
2026-05-11 20:12:12	schultmc	reviewed at:
2026-05-11 20:12:14	schultmc	https://www.spi-inc.org/meetings/minutes/2026/2026-04-13/
2026-05-11 20:12:18	fsf	Voting started, 9 people (borden,fsf,fungi,jconway,jesusalva[m],mappx,milan,schultmc,zumbi) allowed to vote on Accept meeting minutes for Monday 13 April 2026. - You may vote yes/no/abstain only, type !vote $yourchoice now.
2026-05-11 20:12:23	schultmc	!vote yes
2026-05-11 20:12:26	borden	!vote yes
2026-05-11 20:12:27	fungi	!vote yes
2026-05-11 20:12:27	zumbi	!vote abstain
2026-05-11 20:12:32	mappx	!vote yes
2026-05-11 20:12:39	jconway	!vote yes
2026-05-11 20:12:43	fsf	!vote yes
2026-05-11 20:12:45	milan	!vote yes
2026-05-11 20:13:03	Jesusalva[m]	!vote yes
2026-05-11 20:13:21	fsf	Current voting results for "Accept meeting minutes for Monday 13 April 2026": Yes: 8, No: 0, Abstain: 1, Missing: 0 ()
2026-05-11 20:13:24	fsf	Voting for "Accept meeting minutes for Monday 13 April 2026" closed.
2026-05-11 20:13:38	fsf	let the record show that, perhaps for the first time ever, i didn't goof the usernames
2026-05-11 20:13:58	borden	I wasn't going to say anything, but mine is correct.
2026-05-11 20:14:07	zumbi	:clap,clap:
2026-05-11 20:14:09	schultmc	[item 8, Items up for discussion]
2026-05-11 20:14:13	schultmc	[item 8.1, Preliminary Planning for In-Person Meeting]
2026-05-11 20:14:17	fungi	it's been suggested that there are some items of outstanding business which would benefit from, or perhaps are even blocked on the recent lack of, an in-person gathering of the spi board of directors
2026-05-11 20:14:22	fungi	i'm happy to help arrange the agenda and record minutes for such an event, though depending on logistics may need to do so remotely
2026-05-11 20:14:28	fungi	i'm seeking one or more volunteers to whom I can delegate the event planning for this activity (arranging a venue, scheduling and related tasks)
2026-05-11 20:14:44	Jesusalva[m]	fungi: Fungi
2026-05-11 20:14:51	Jesusalva[m]	Your secretary term ends in August
2026-05-11 20:14:54	borden	I'm out. I had to look most of those words up in a dictionary
2026-05-11 20:15:09	Jesusalva[m]	There's one more regular meeting before AGM and director elections
2026-05-11 20:15:23	fungi	ah, yeah so a few months to go still ;)
2026-05-11 20:15:55	schultmc	Not sure the timeframe we're planning on but I'm unavailable May 20-26, the last week of july, august 11-13, and september 11-13.
2026-05-11 20:15:58	zumbi	fungi, it could also be virtual meeting
2026-05-11 20:16:26	schultmc	we did a virtual meeting in 2020 iirc and it worked out well
2026-05-11 20:16:33	Jesusalva[m]	Also, sorry, Element mobile isn't very nice for sync meetings. Some tasks like bylaws and Associated Project Framework updates are blocked, and the agenda we had made on gitlab is already longer than the time the F2F tends to last
2026-05-11 20:17:02	mappx	I would like to volunteer to help with this fungi (in-person gatherine of the spi board of directors), even if it is virtual, I am happy to help
2026-05-11 20:17:13	mappx	*gathering
2026-05-11 20:17:52	Jesusalva[m]	It's possible to do it either physically or remotely. Physical is usually better, but that means managing visas and getting a space, so it's better to try remote first and if it's insufficient, then do a physical one
2026-05-11 20:17:54	fsf	i really enjoyed the last f2f. virtual worked well enough and i understand if the cost:benefit isn't there, but real-actual-not-video-chat was nice
2026-05-11 20:17:55	zumbi	I am happy to provide insight or input, but I have very limited time.
2026-05-11 20:17:57	fungi	if it's really just a matter of finding an extended period (or periods) of time where most of us are available, that's a lot easier than handling an in-person venue, for sure
2026-05-11 20:18:20	borden	My strength is filling out paperwork, so as long as I'm not talking to people or using my lack of judgement, I should be good for those tasks
2026-05-11 20:18:40	fungi	how much time do we think we'd need in total (can be split up across multiple days, of course)?
2026-05-11 20:18:58	fsf	is our previous venue a possibility? i remember that it was a board member's job that allowed us to use it - but don't remember which board member. and of course NYC may not be appropriate for folks' location this time around
2026-05-11 20:18:59	Jesusalva[m]	Yeah, although it's possible to see in unis etc for space. The problem, of course, is that most Holidays happen in the first semester of the year
2026-05-11 20:19:14	schultmc	We've done 1-2 days for treasury tasks followed by 1-2 days for general board tasks in the past
2026-05-11 20:19:31	fungi	are those 8-hour days? longer? shorter?
2026-05-11 20:19:37	schultmc	8 hour days typically
2026-05-11 20:19:57	borden	Then I'm definitely out
2026-05-11 20:20:11	fungi	okay, so roughly a week, either all at once or in aggregate
2026-05-11 20:20:56	zumbi	roughly a weekend, I'd say, at least for board
2026-05-11 20:21:03	Jesusalva[m]	Ihttps://gitlab.com/spi-inc/board-private/-/work_items/10
2026-05-11 20:21:06	Jesusalva[m]	https://gitlab.com/spi-inc/board-private/-/work_items/10
2026-05-11 20:21:31	Jesusalva[m]	Some new tasks not there but it's a good reference
2026-05-11 20:21:54	Jesusalva[m]	We might also need some time to discuss RACI and processes
2026-05-11 20:22:01	Jesusalva[m]	I think 2 days for Board won't be enough
2026-05-11 20:22:04	fungi	i've handled week-long virtual events, at least, and we can presumably get by with any free jitsi-meet instance (including the debian jitsi, i'd imagine? though i also operate one in another open source community that would be happy to host it and i can guarantee privacy)
2026-05-11 20:23:03	Jesusalva[m]	I don't think Treasury will need a full day but Zumbi will know better
2026-05-11 20:23:24	Jesusalva[m]	It might depend on if we want to change audit or not
2026-05-11 20:23:48	fungi	will we want the discussions recorded, or intentionally not recorded? detailed transcripts or summary minutes? do we follow the chatham house rule for these?
2026-05-11 20:24:32	zumbi	last time, we did two days for treasurer and it was even short, however there is nothing critical at this time
2026-05-11 20:24:57	Jesusalva[m]	And the queue is much better managed nowadays, zumbi
2026-05-11 20:25:06	schultmc	https://www.spi-inc.org/meetings/minutes/2019/2019-11-22-f2f-new-york/ is the minutes from the 2019 f2f for reference
2026-05-11 20:25:15	fsf	In my experience we take normal high-level notes, don't record things verbatim, and don't go hard on procedure. It's not super-intense, just making use of high-bandwidth communication. Any votes and simialr need good notes, of course
2026-05-11 20:25:22	Jesusalva[m]	If we do in-person, I probably can look at reserving a meeting room either at where I work or at uni, but I believe Portugal is a better location than Brazil because visas
2026-05-11 20:25:33	fungi	thanks, the last one was just prior to my time on the board, so the context from it is helpful for me
2026-05-11 20:25:50	Jesusalva[m]	I think most of us don't need a Visa to visit Portugal
2026-05-11 20:26:31	fsf	Oh. Right. Yeah I can't imagine coming to the united states on purpose right now as a non-citizen. Portugal makes sense
2026-05-11 20:27:01	schultmc	I've been studing Portuguese in anticipation of a possible f2f in Portugal ;)
2026-05-11 20:27:16	Jesusalva[m]	I don't think there's any holiday we can take advantage of, and 8h is quite some effort to unblock in the agenda. But SPI does cover travel costs, so it might be possible to arrange with vacations
2026-05-11 20:27:34	zumbi	I can contact Jose from Tecnico Univ and check if they can offer a meeting room
2026-05-11 20:28:04	zumbi	.. we have been discussing about this for years now. Tecnico is in Lisbon.
2026-05-11 20:28:50	Jesusalva[m]	If asked as a plan B, I can check possibilities in Brasilia's North Wing (Brazil's capital), but visa-wise I believe Portugal is less restrictive than Brazil
2026-05-11 20:29:50	Jesusalva[m]	I think asking zumbi is a good idea, but we might need to sync up our vacations to make it happen
2026-05-11 20:30:02	zumbi	Lisbon is well connected too. An alternative could also be Barcelona, it is well connected too.
2026-05-11 20:31:09	schultmc	My boss has explicitly requested I use more of my vacation time throughout the year rather than taking off a large chunk of time in December like I have been recently
2026-05-11 20:31:47	mappx	the University of Coimbra provided a meeting room for the EuroBSDCon conference held there a few years ago, and what a gorgeous site, but it's in Coimbra (not easy to get to)
2026-05-11 20:31:51	Jesusalva[m]	Let's check. We have everyone present, so: is someone unable or unwilling to arrange vacations for this?
2026-05-11 20:31:59	fungi	i'd be happy to participate remotely, even if it means being awake lisbon daytime hours. taking time off work is easy though travel is logistically challenging for me at the moment, but i definitely don't want to discourage other board members from meeting somewhere in-person
2026-05-11 20:32:46	schultmc	I'm fine with taking vacation time for either in person or virtual meetings and have already listed my conflicts through september 2026
2026-05-11 20:32:47	Jesusalva[m]	fungi, of course, SPI will cover the travel cost, you might need to spend an additional day to arrive though
2026-05-11 20:33:32	Jesusalva[m]	I tend to make large amounts of additional hours so I probably can arrange even without vacations. But my boss is flexible, it should be possible
2026-05-11 20:33:33	jconway	heh -- the last face-to-face predates my time on the board. I am planning to retire after my term is up, but if somehow I am still around I would go.
2026-05-11 20:33:34	fungi	the cost isn't an issue for me either, fwiw, but yes i don't live somewhere that's easy to get to/from
2026-05-11 20:34:30	fungi	and with already having to travel for my day job, i'm trying not to do any more than i absolutely have to, because i find it miserabl;e
2026-05-11 20:36:10	Jesusalva[m]	Fair enough. Some people still haven't replied
2026-05-11 20:36:11	milan	I'm fine with taking vacation. Lisbon or Barcelona, I will most likely be there.
2026-05-11 20:37:18	fungi	if i lived near a major airport it might be different, but lately i end up with day+ long delays on either end due to flight cancellations and the like
2026-05-11 20:37:53	fungi	i've missed more events and meetings than i care to remember because by the time i would finally have arrived it would be over or nearly so
2026-05-11 20:38:28	fungi	so virtual/remote is a lot more reliable of an option for me
2026-05-11 20:38:48	milan	Travel is not an issue to me, I'm flexible in that regard.
2026-05-11 20:38:58	Jesusalva[m]	mappx borden
2026-05-11 20:39:23	fsf	I'm happy to make things work on my end. I can't promise exactly what without knowing more, but I'll either be there in the flesh or remotely so long as it's not a very very bad time for me. I get 2.5 days of free leave for volunteering anyway, so the impact to my work-life is minimal. It's the home-life that requires more consideration
2026-05-11 20:39:28	Jesusalva[m]	And I think fsf still haven't replied
2026-05-11 20:39:34	mappx	Travel isn't an issue for me, and I'm also flexible
2026-05-11 20:39:34	Jesusalva[m]	But he just did
2026-05-11 20:39:35	borden	I can reluctantly travel to Portugal. E-conference is easier for me.
2026-05-11 20:39:40	Jesusalva[m]	So I blame Element again
2026-05-11 20:39:43	fsf	yeah basically what mappx said :)
2026-05-11 20:40:11	fsf	Naw, that was me being slow  Jesusalva[m] - I was just keeping quiet since I didn't realize i should provide positive assent
2026-05-11 20:40:12	fungi	so it does sound like there's a critical mass willing to travel, and someone up for negotiating a venue
2026-05-11 20:40:44	zumbi	problem is finding the right time
2026-05-11 20:40:54	Jesusalva[m]	Yeah. As long as we have someone to coordinate so everyone sync's the dates it should happen
2026-05-11 20:40:55	fungi	we're running out of time for the remainder of the meeting agenda, but i can put together an async poll for scheduling options
2026-05-11 20:41:16	fungi	i'll have that in everyone's inboxes some time this week
2026-05-11 20:41:19	Jesusalva[m]	Yeah, that should help
2026-05-11 20:41:28	Jesusalva[m]	Okay, thanks fungi
2026-05-11 20:42:15	schultmc	[item 8.2, Windows Code Signing Certificate]
2026-05-11 20:42:24	fungi	this was requested by Perdu
2026-05-11 20:42:26	Perdu	That should be short
2026-05-11 20:42:29	Perdu	In short, I just want a confirmation that I can move on on Windows Code Signing Certificate by opening a new Azure account for SPI under President's name (which I won't do without explicit approval). Or I need an officer to do it if I'm not allowed to.
2026-05-11 20:42:35	Perdu	Longer version: several projects expressed interest in having some kind of certificate to avoid the warning Windows displays to users when executing their game. Jonatas has expressed that SPI could pay for a certificate that could be shared between projects using the general found. To set that up, I need to open a new Azure account.
2026-05-11 20:43:04	schultmc	Perdu: sounds reasonable to me
2026-05-11 20:43:15	fsf	Me too. Should we take a formal vote, or is informal enough?
2026-05-11 20:43:17	zumbi	fine with me too
2026-05-11 20:43:22	jconway	wfm
2026-05-11 20:43:42	fungi	i have no objections
2026-05-11 20:43:46	Jesusalva[m]	wfm
2026-05-11 20:43:48	mappx	wfm
2026-05-11 20:43:52	Perdu	Sound good then
2026-05-11 20:43:54	milan	no objection here
2026-05-11 20:44:05	Jesusalva[m]	I think it can pass by contrast and move on
2026-05-11 20:44:11	schultmc	[item 8.3, Gitlab Open Source License Renewal]
2026-05-11 20:44:17	Perdu	Renewing the Gitlab license is tedious this year. They changed the rules on the Gitlab for Open Source license in a way that no longer fits our usage, as only one private repository is allowed. I'm trying to switch to a Gitlab for Nonprofits license but it's taking a long time and I'm afraid we may miss the renewal mark (currently trying to get the company verified by Goodmark for this,
2026-05-11 20:44:19	Perdu	and I may urgently need an officer to do this process and they refuse the application I made in my own name).
2026-05-11 20:44:31	Perdu	Alternative could be to move to Debian Salsa, which I will use as an backup solution. However, since Debian is a SPI-associated project, I'm wondering if having internal SPI documents (board-private and treasurer-private) hosted on their instance could constitute some form of conflict of interest.
2026-05-11 20:44:33	Perdu	Overall, I'd like to know if board would prefer staying on Gitlab or moving to Debian Salsa.
2026-05-11 20:44:35	Perdu	YO
2026-05-11 20:44:50	Perdu	(Ignore last line)
2026-05-11 20:45:30	fungi	i also use salsa, though it might be a bit weird to have private repos there
2026-05-11 20:45:43	mappx	I would prefer to stay with GitLab and I do think that moving to Debian Salsa presents a conflict of interest
2026-05-11 20:46:01	fungi	i don't expressly object to the idea, but if we can get gitlab to solve the current license issue that would be preferable for me
2026-05-11 20:46:08	schultmc	I don't have a preference - a neutral third party provider does seem less likely to have a CoI
2026-05-11 20:46:22	zumbi	I think we could move everything but board repo to self-hosted gitolite or similar, and keep board repo in gitlab
2026-05-11 20:46:49	Perdu	That's also a possibility
2026-05-11 20:46:54	zumbi	a third party provider, codeberg or some such would also work for me
2026-05-11 20:47:01	fsf	i'd prefer that we don't self-host
2026-05-11 20:47:14	zumbi	fsf: why?
2026-05-11 20:47:34	fungi	i'll note that it has recently become *very* challenging to run a public-facing git service (i do it for my day job and it's become a nightmare in the past few months especially)
2026-05-11 20:47:49	fsf	because then we have to maintain and secure the infrastructure. if there is a Big Problem, it is Our Problem as opposed to the entity that is providing hosting
2026-05-11 20:47:53	zumbi	treasurer data I believe self-hosting is best way forward for privacy reasons, and we can always have backups
2026-05-11 20:48:10	fsf	yes, exactly fungi
2026-05-11 20:48:45	zumbi	this does not need to be public facing, few people need access and it is private
2026-05-11 20:48:59	zumbi	for public facing, we can use gitlab
2026-05-11 20:49:13	Jesusalva[m]	Treasurer data isn't really shared with the public so it can be self hosted. It doesn't even need a web page, imo
2026-05-11 20:49:15	fsf	and then the access mechanisms and ACLs need maintenance and surely there is _some_ public-facing surface, unless you want to VPN, which then is its own can of worms and and and
2026-05-11 20:49:37	Jesusalva[m]	I think it can be just a plain git init connected through ssh
2026-05-11 20:49:39	zumbi	ssh should be good enough
2026-05-11 20:49:41	Perdu	The big private repos we have are: board-private, treasurer-private, sysadmin's infrastructure repo and sysadmin documentation
2026-05-11 20:50:05	milan	Plain git through ssh would work for me just fine.
2026-05-11 20:50:22	fungi	yeah, i guess if it's authenticated-only access and we use it exclusively for private repos for board members and contractors then i don't have as much of a concern, we could presumably still keep our public repos on gitlab's service instead
2026-05-11 20:50:24	Jesusalva[m]	Also, I think only treasurer repo is a conflict with Debian Salsa
2026-05-11 20:50:34	Perdu	sysadmin-doc can move to board-private and the other 2 can be managed through git+ssh
2026-05-11 20:50:49	Jesusalva[m]	Could work
2026-05-11 20:51:07	Jesusalva[m]	And makes sense to put all processes related info into board private repo
2026-05-11 20:51:17	fungi	git+ssh doesn't even need a "web presence", just a directory on a (virtual) shell server would do
2026-05-11 20:51:21	zumbi	that works for me
2026-05-11 20:52:54	zumbi	board-private we can keep in gitlab, I assume
2026-05-11 20:53:15	Jesusalva[m]	Yeah, sounds good to me zumbi
2026-05-11 20:53:25	Perdu	Jesusalva[m]: so, moving private repos except treasurer-private on Salsa is also an option then?
2026-05-11 20:54:18	Perdu	OK, well, I have several options then
2026-05-11 20:54:34	zumbi	I don't have strong opinion, but if we self-host one, if there a problem to self-host the others?
2026-05-11 20:54:35	Perdu	Hopefully Gitlab will respond in time and this will not be a problem
2026-05-11 20:54:36	Jesusalva[m]	I think so. Treasurer private to self host, board private where it is, others we migrate to Salsa on meantime if necessary
2026-05-11 20:54:47	Jesusalva[m]	Otherwise move them to either ssh only or merge
2026-05-11 20:54:54	fungi	my main concern with relying on salsa is that we're making dsa (or at least the salsa admins) responsible for our stuff, when that's not actually their responsibility
2026-05-11 20:54:54	Jesusalva[m]	Whatever makes more sense
2026-05-11 20:55:29	mappx	Perdu: +1
2026-05-11 20:55:33	zumbi	fungi: we should be responsible for our stuff
2026-05-11 20:55:52	zumbi	also this maybe temporary until gitlab discussion resolves
2026-05-11 20:57:18	Perdu	board-private on gitlab and the other private repositories on self-host seems to be the easiest solution
2026-05-11 20:57:43	zumbi	fine for me, go for it
2026-05-11 20:57:52	Perdu	Alright
2026-05-11 20:57:57	Perdu	I'm good with this point
2026-05-11 20:58:09	fungi	thanks
2026-05-11 20:58:12	schultmc	[item 9, Any other business]
2026-05-11 20:58:14	schultmc	Anything to discuss?
2026-05-11 20:58:39	fsf	Nothin' here
2026-05-11 20:58:57	zumbi	I want to comment something
2026-05-11 20:58:59	Jesusalva[m]	I hope not, some stuff m_rabelo needs probably won't happen so soon either
2026-05-11 20:59:05	Jesusalva[m]	Say, zumbi
2026-05-11 20:59:54	zumbi	I have contacted developer to work on a couple projects, we have discussed in the past, one is a project dashboard to show info to projects (treasury reports, etc.) and a donations portal.
2026-05-11 21:01:00	fungi	sounds great to me
2026-05-11 21:01:14	mappx	same here
2026-05-11 21:01:42	zumbi	We plan to sign a master service agreement and start with 50h of work for a minimal viable product.
2026-05-11 21:02:20	fungi	that also seems reasonable (depending on the contents of the msa of course)
2026-05-11 21:02:28	jconway	I need to drop -- are we done?
2026-05-11 21:02:34	milan	zumbi: +1
2026-05-11 21:02:35	zumbi	If you have any concern, comment or question, please let me know
2026-05-11 21:02:46	zumbi	jconway: basically, yes, thanks
2026-05-11 21:02:51	Jesusalva[m]	Yeah, I'm also involved and forgot to comment
2026-05-11 21:02:55	Jesusalva[m]	*hides*
2026-05-11 21:02:56	jconway	o/
2026-05-11 21:03:35	zumbi	Well, then that's all then.
2026-05-11 21:03:41	schultmc	[item 10, Next board meeting]
2026-05-11 21:03:41	schultmc	The next board meeting is scheduled for: June 8, 2026 at 2000 UTC.
2026-05-11 21:03:42	schultmc	Any objections?
2026-05-11 21:03:44	schultmc	wfm
2026-05-11 21:03:50	fungi	i should be available
2026-05-11 21:03:53	milan	wfm too
2026-05-11 21:03:57	mappx	wfm
2026-05-11 21:03:57	zumbi	should be fine for me
2026-05-11 21:04:17	Jesusalva[m]	I hope to attend